The
Evolution Mechanism Story is the Same - Time did it!
So if a
Princess kisses a frog and he turns into a Prince, we call it a fairytale, but if we add 500 million
years we call it "science"!
Evolutionists
try to explain the unexplainable away with lots of time, attempting to trump
known cell mechanisms, reason, and laboratory experiments with the time
argument. So somehow the scientifically un-provable becomes fact with enough time,
imagination, drawings and words, like this fairytale!
Gaps in the fossil record contradict
evolution. All that
is needed to form a fossil is water, the right mineral covering and movement. The mechanism is key, a Super-Intelligence
that made the environment can handle creating a life code that ensures 'Kind' survival across a wide range of
variables and climates. That’s not
evolution, that’s good design! In
truth, we see a massive explosion of all life kinds living at the same time,
like a constellation, not isolated progression on a single thread, mutating one unto another in the evolution "common decent" notion, which is
actually variation of kinds, asking you to take a mental leap from one class to another in the evolutionary progression from algae to man! See the "Question of Fossils" topic page for more. If this
dino chases the bird long enough, he just may just add feathers, hollow bones,
a specialized lung, warm blood
and fly! "It had core features
that define birds, such as flight feathers, wings, perching feet, and a
wishbone Archeopteryx is still just an
extinct bird, now found with soft tissue!"1
Some Gaps of Kinds to think about-
Evolution claims to bridge these gaps through
gross mutations in the notion of common decent;
Non-life
to life (dead chemicals - single cell marvels)
Cell to
Multi-cell
Multi-cell
to Invertebrates, (algae to worms)
Algae to
Plants, plants to trees/germination/seeds
Invertebrates
to Vertebrates (Snails, worms etc. to fish)
Insects?
Alone
Water
Vertebrates to Land types, (Fish to Reptiles, water to air breathing)
Reptiles
to Birds (cold blooded to warm, solid to hollow boned, 1-3 ear type)
Reptiles
to Mammals (cold blooded to warm)
Mammals
to Bats (add wings and a sonar to a mouse - 'super-mouse'!)
Mammals
back to water - Bears to Whales and Marine Mammals
At each
of these boundaries evolution would need thousands of mutational mistakes,
where are they and why don't they exist and occur today?
Must see link exposing what a leading evolutionist says about mutations creating new types;
http://www.icr.org/article/6429/ (1)
Case in point – The Reptile to Mammal
series – the Ear
Humans
(and all mammals) have a 3-bone ear
structure where three tiny bones link in a line between the ear drum and nerve
system. Reptiles on the other hand, have
a single bone making the same connection. An attractive
feature designed so we can speak, eat, move and listen all at the same time
through articulated joints. For
evolution to accomplish this feat it would involve concordant DNA code addition
of the three tiny bones, the cartilage that holds them in line, auditory nerve
changes, muscles, cartilage, jaw structures, blood vessels and the like with no
plan, and according to evolution - by thousands of accidentally coordinated mutations over millions of years!
The reptile single bone ear
ear opening in red
box
Reptile
single bone ear - hearing to prey or flee, not for speaking while eating!
A
reptile has only one of these bones. So
how could a reptile with single bone ear mutate to a 3-bone ear if Common
Decent is true? And where are all the
transitional forms from one to three bone
ear types (none of which have been found), and how could they still hear while
mutating from reptiles to mammals for millions of years? How would these deaf mutations survive, mate
and have hearing offspring??
And this
is only one portion of anatomy to get from a reptile to a mouse! Ears and hearing are extremely complex organs,
being very sensitive and complex. In
addition, mammals have a Corti organ, not found in reptiles;
“ The Organ of Corti is a
gelatinous mass about 4 cm long and is composed of some '7500 interrelated part's. It
dispatches to the brain a coded version
of the original sound information “ (2).
This is just one of the gulfs of faith evolution would need to cross,
there are thousands more. Did you come
from a lizard? Evolution says you did,
'oh, it was very slowly', they claim!
Extra-uterine life, life-support transfer
at birth - Your miracle of life
The Foramen
Ovale "Life Valve" , upper
center. Closes once in your lifetime
This
physiological event occurs at the point of delivery of every newborn
child. As a baby depends upon it's
mother for life sustaining connections while in the womb, a transfer to the air
breathing, blood circulation and other
life-sustaining systems must take place in a matter of seconds after birth. This
interdependent and very complex sequence must take place in order. For the blood circulation system alone, It
involves a specific sequence if critical pressures and a single valve in the
heart, the Foramen Ovale, only used once in your lifetime for this
purpose. If any portion of the pressure
sequence fails to operate properly the heart will fail. If mindless evolution in its accident and
chance probabilities were involved in this process, would not all the first offspring die, so how could such a complex
device and sequence of events ever
complete its trail and error? One would
not be incorrect to call this process "the miracle of birth", another
falsification of evolutionary theory that says "time did it".
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foramen_ovale_%28heart%29
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adaptation_to_extrauterine_life
To Summarize, these complex organs and anatomies cannot be explained by evolution changes crossing gaps in the biological world by accident and chance, would you leave the operation of your heart to chance?
World-famous
chemist tells the truth: there’s no scientist alive today who understands
macroevolution;
Professor James M. Tour is currently a
Professor of Chemistry, Computer Science, and Professor of Mechanical
Engineering and Materials Science at Rice University. He has authored or
co-authored 489 scientific publications and his name is on 36 patents.
Tour, along with over 700 other scientists,
took the courageous step back in 2001 of signing the Discovery Institute’s “A
Scientific Dissent from Darwinism”, which read: “We are skeptical of claims for
the ability of random mutation and natural selection to account for the
complexity of life. Careful examination of the evidence for Darwinian theory
should be encouraged.”
I simply do not
understand, chemically, how macroevolution could have happened.
I will tell you
as a scientist and a synthetic chemist: if
anybody should be able to understand evolution, it is me, because I make
molecules for a living".
"Let me tell you
what goes on in the back rooms of science – with National Academy members, with
Nobel Prize winners. I have sat with them, and when I get them alone, not in
public – because it’s a scary thing, if you say what I just said – I say, “Do
you understand all of this, where all of this came from, and how this happens?”
Every time that I have sat with people who are synthetic chemists, who
understand this, they go “Uh-uh. Nope.” (1,2)
Thank you for your time, make sure you take time to view Evolution Falsified I, and clic on the October and September posts, God Bless you!
Scientists that dispute evolution;
DarwinAd4.qxd - 100ScientistsAd.pdf
Videos; Evidence for Creation (17 ) The Reproductive System - Part 1 of 3Scientists that dispute evolution;
DarwinAd4.qxd - 100ScientistsAd.pdf
Evidence for Creation (12) The Giraffe
From a Frog to a Prince: Biological Evidence of Creation
Copyrights 2014 by Mark D. Rose All rights reserved
No comments:
Post a Comment