Life forms need
planning, are complex and did not descend from one to another.
So can
universal order in the natural world come about by accidents, chance and time,
meaning all life came from mutations, beginning with mindless chemical's? Or
more directly, teaching that this bird, all DNA and you are a mutation? Who has any right to call you a mutant? That’s exactly the
mechanism in which evolution is based, and it’s an assertion that we will
show is absolutely wrong!
The Gulf from Single Cell to Multi-cellular life.
Once a single celled creature, always
a single celled creature, the same for multi-celled types.
Life begets life, but boundaries exist
between kinds and complexity. So we have
the world of classical evolution telling us that this upward mindless and
self-creating motivation (or Common
Decent as they like to call it) is fact.
Common Decent meaning the first cell started it all, mutated into more
complex life and so on in a line of complexity and size, crossing gaps. Now
understanding the operating principals of the cell and DNA coding, these
notions have come under intense scrutiny of late, even from those outside the community
of faith. Can we really cross this gulf
without breaking the rules of logic, experience and common sense? As Dr. Crick proposed, this is a lot of data,
thousands of different codes for all types of life like the cell and bird
above, just like different software apps
and programs. Can a 4 million base code
single-cell that supposedly 'self-formed' can 'self-change'
into another and another without a plan for the next succeeding sage without intelligence acting upon
it? That’s what evolution theory claims,
with mindless mutation it's engine and natural selection it's guiding hand!
A test you can do that's fun!
Setup a bird feeder fill it and note all the unique variety of birds that come to visit each morning. Note that each species is unique and special. You may see Chickadees, Thrush, Catbirds, Sparrows, Grossbeaks, Nuthatches and many more. The list may also include Blue Brids Jays, Robins, Yellow FInch, I've even had Woodpeckers come and get into the act. I know you will be amazed how may different types come to visit not to mention the differences in male and female. But wait, are there any BlueThush, Nutbeaks, Catsparrows or Chickafinch? No, not a one! But why?, its because each have unique DNA and reproduction boundaries. If evolution were true, you should see some type of mutational changes and cross breeding occuring, right?,but no, not a one. The entire planet is like this among all species down to insects and even bacteria. See the topic the Question of Data and you will get the picture. Evolutionists want you to believe the changes are happening very slowly, but all these are found as fossils the same as they are today and since man has walked the earth!
A test you can do that's fun!
Setup a bird feeder fill it and note all the unique variety of birds that come to visit each morning. Note that each species is unique and special. You may see Chickadees, Thrush, Catbirds, Sparrows, Grossbeaks, Nuthatches and many more. The list may also include Blue Brids Jays, Robins, Yellow FInch, I've even had Woodpeckers come and get into the act. I know you will be amazed how may different types come to visit not to mention the differences in male and female. But wait, are there any BlueThush, Nutbeaks, Catsparrows or Chickafinch? No, not a one! But why?, its because each have unique DNA and reproduction boundaries. If evolution were true, you should see some type of mutational changes and cross breeding occuring, right?,but no, not a one. The entire planet is like this among all species down to insects and even bacteria. See the topic the Question of Data and you will get the picture. Evolutionists want you to believe the changes are happening very slowly, but all these are found as fossils the same as they are today and since man has walked the earth!
How
do we test for evolutions operation?
If we start with single cell life in
the laboratory, shouldn’t we be able to create new kinds, or even improved
versions, if evolution is true? But we
see a cell mechanism that’s based on a closed code with no apparatus to add
information, no reading heads like your computer has, correct? So how does it
add new information for new anatomies to function, by itself? Has evolution been observed to actually work?
We will see…
Good Science in the Lab
has falsified Evolution
Research has been conducted to speedup evolutionary potentials using
time& generations in the laboratory to prove that evolution works. So how can we speed up time? As we have shown, life forms, even those
indescribably small are very, very
complex. So to make things simple,
two life forms were chosen by scientists because of their fast reproductive
cycles; the bacteria Ecoli, and the
fruit fly Drosophila.
In summary, these were subjected to
every conceivable variable and environment to call out variations through
thousands of generations over time,
hoping to bring about positive mutations and hopefully, make new forms to prove
evolution works, somehow.
In the case of the bacteria, 40,000
generations were tested and no substantial changes were observed over a 20 year
period.
Mutations in Fruit flies - does this
look good? Ecoli = Ecoli after 40,000 generations!
No matter how hard the best scientists
in the In the end, a fruit fly was
a fruit fly (with corrupted wings and changes in eye color), and a bacteria was a
bacteria! When the core data on the
bacteria was studied, it was found that the most changes came early in the
generational timeline but effected very little (such as resistance to various
drugs, deformations), then change flattened out for the last 3/4 of the
20 year experiment. This shows that pre-designed
boundaries of variation/adaptation were exhibited
physiologically, but then hit boundaries and could change no further.
So we have evolution, the Darwinian
trans-kind of mutation based evolution, falsified
in the laboratory. Push as they may
in controlled conditions, the fly and bacteria reacted exactly as it's
programming limits directed by the DNA allows for its kind, no more and
no less.
So what we know about the cell
mechanism's and DNA played out perfectly with no surprises! Evolution was falsified - again, just as
we observe living on Earth today, with no transitional accidental types being
born or living in observation.
Tompkins, Jeffery P. Design and
complexity of the Cell 2012 p 30 (1)
Micro-Evolution
Misrepresented Macro-Evolution?
The Dog kind. Starting in size from Chiwawa to the Great
Dane, a dog is a dog. Pure genetic
information (as contained in all the original 'kinds' at the beginning of earth -life)
can be manipulated through breeding to bring out different useful traits, plus adaptation to the environment (long/short hair as an example) and no
more. In fact, breeders can selectively
cross-breed and get the code back in new offspring, that’s not evolution,
that’s just great pre-planning in knowing how to use the DNA code!
And how about individual personalities
in the same breeds? If evolution were true,
shouldn't these be erased and each doggie have the exact same personality and
characteristics if they were a product of mindlessness? But no they don't, the Creator has instilled individuality and personalities in
animals and as we know, People! And
what about feelings, sad/happy/angry/jealousy/etc? and bread instincts? One of our dogs, a sheep dog, would corner
and heard a white soccer ball before it ever saw a sheep as a puppy! Now isn't it sad that evolution attempt's to pirate the vast creative abilities of
the Creator of life and call it all mindlessly self-made! Instinctive breeding is very useful for
mankind in all domestic animals and its no accident, its in their DNA!
A 'Kind' boundary is also be related
to reproduction ability, a common identifier to determine speciation. When different
kinds exceed reproduction boundaries, such as the horse, donkey and mule
series, (1) where the offspring, mules, are sterile, so a wall is hit. So if animals mate and produce some kind of
mutation, it stands to reason a female and male must somehow find each other
and be productive. But in observation,
experience and reality, this has never happened, they are always sterile or
deformed!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mule (1)
In the realm of religion, the Bible
does have a hint for us;
"For
since the Creation of the world, God’s invisible qualities—his eternal power
and divine nature have been clearly seen, being understood from what has been
made, so that man is without excuse."
Invisible qualities - Micro-sized Axial Proton powered motors,
code systems and cells
Seen - see them with only the most powerful imaging sensors
Made - Intelligence acting on Matter
The Passionflower - Unexplainable beauty
Engaging truth?
Many in science and
education are accusing people who discuss these ideas as "back-door
evangelizing" and promoting a belief in God. But is this a valid argument regarding
origins ideas? Who has the right to accuse as such when obviously evolutionists
have faith also - in time and absence of
intelligence acting on matter!
That’s a belief system based on faith, but evolutionists want a monopoly
claiming to be "scientific" meaning
if any thought that intelligence is involved, such a deduction is
automatically unscientific! So if one
says there's good reason to believe God
did it by common sense and observation, that's just as valid a belief as
theirs, so such accusations are patently invalid and outside the realm of
operational science. A person should be
able to say, "I believe God did this" and have just as strong or
stronger logical position as anyone who claims it came about without God.
How can evolutionists
give themselves privilege judging those who believe differently to be wrong and
"religious" because of a faith they don’t share! That’s arrogance, they excuse anything that
suggests a higher intelligence invalid and automatically unscientific! In a way they are making themselves Gods over
origins thinking, so we actually enter the realm of mind control, like communist countries that manipulate and brainwash people to protect their
system of belief by force. So origins beliefs
should be a personal decision not related to ones intelligence or ability to
teach or work in science, but unfortunately teachers and scientists that
mention God as a possible answer to the origin of life are
ostracized and often removed from positions by institutions who have the power to do so, just like what happens in communist countries,
and maybe worse in America the land of the free! Truth is truth and we need to be free to believe it!
It take's a pile of faith to imagine an ion motor, a cell or a Passion Flower came about from
self-made nothingness. Such a view is revealing of the core philosophy of those
who embrace evolution as the only answer of life origin. Like a 747 or a Proton Motor, no
one believes it formed itself. See the" Question of Origins" topic.
The Gaps in the fossil record, when questioned closely, have
perplexed honest Zoologists for decades.
Dr. Collin Patterson, Zoology Director
of the British Museum for many years was making comments like below to inside
circles in the 1980's before his passing in 1992.
"One day I was thinking that
after studying this stuff for over 20 years, that there isn't one thing that I
know about it, that is true. I asked
this question to various people and groups, including a very
prestigious group of evolutionists in Chicago, and all I got was silence for a
long time and then someone spoke up, "well, I know one thing, it shouldn't
be taught in High School".
The author personally interviewed Dr.
Patterson about this comment and he affirmed its accuracy and context. Though not a public advocate of Intelligent
Design, Dr. Patterson in no way opposed my understanding of origins as
presented here. He confirmed my
observations of living animal gaps with no intermediates between, I mentioning
my experience and observations in Alaska, to this his comment was; "My
friends in the tropics tell me the same thing". He closed the conversation saying - "May
you be successful in your quest for truth".
Please view all 17 posts by opening the September and October posts on the right hand ask bar!
Scientists that dispute evolution;
DarwinAd4.qxd - 100ScientistsAd.pdf
Please view all 17 posts by opening the September and October posts on the right hand ask bar!
Scientists that dispute evolution;
DarwinAd4.qxd - 100ScientistsAd.pdf
DNA - God's amazing programming; evidence for his existence
Copyrights 2014 by Mark D. Rose All rights reserved
No comments:
Post a Comment