The Question of Data

The Data, all this unique code!

 

The data origin question must be answered  

So where did all this coding data come from?, someone or something must have coded for the life kinds on Earth, now that the science is done and we understand the cells basic workings. Who/what created the elaborate cell system in the first place? A cell has only reading heads, unlike your computer that can read or write data, a cell cannot add information to the DNA, there's simply no structures to do so, this is called is a closed system.  A cell can archive and replicate data and itself (RNA), make real life things we observe; plants, trees, fish, birds, mammals, elephant's and whales; all beginning with one cell  having the correct code running in the background, just like the software used to view this page right now!  

Now think about this, as the cell and DNA code engine operate dependent on each other outside of environmental influence, clearly natural selection must automatically operate to enhance survival using pre-existing code, and so this is a design feature, not an accident!  Code is never added, but mistakes are. Creatures become more dominate to survive like color, size and other variations, but these adaptations pre-exist in the code of one animal kind, not creating one complete kind after another!  In addition, as the DNA sits within a cell as an independent operating entity (and has been so, changeless, since the since the beginning of biological time), then how can chemical to cell evolution explain this?  If evolution is so answerless at these points why "believe" it at all?  In addition, how could have DNA and the cell factory it controls evolved in identical paths and maintained a communication convention, and a very elaborate one at that, and still be functional for an animal to live and reproduce?  This interrelationship and lack of cell mechanism prohibit anything ever evolving, and utterly closes the door on any possibility that life evolved, ever!  

The truth is the life kinds, like the dog type for instance, had a purer code with more variation range that distributed into the various dog kinds we see today.  That's not evolution, that's planning and design!  If the cell and DNA were a product of dead chemicals and time, wouldn't it make sense that the Cell should be evolving and changing too?  Fact is, it hasn't!  This truth is ignored by evolutionary proponents as it destroys their logical reasoning at every point.  They don't want to use the cell to "prove" evolution at all, they pick and choose tidbits to assemble a story and leave out true cell operation; which is the foundation of understanding how all life works and came about.  In fact, their position is no more than a belief system built on faith - a religion and a poor one at that!  

The truth is this unchanging interrelationship is absolute and proven at the most basic understanding of cell operation.  How could ALL life be based on ONE code system if evolution is driven by random self-directed nothingness, changes and mutations? Completely absurd.  If evolution had any truth to it at all we should see thousands of code types and varied mechanisms, but the fact is we only see ONE.  Now that the microscopes are bigger and the new science is in, viewing things like proton powered axial motors. (1) they are running from the truth and constructing fantastic stories to save their theory, what nonsense. 

Michael Behe Hasn't Been Refuted on the Flagellum - Evolution News & Views  (1)

More bad news for mutation theory; an important 2013 study found even more complexity in DNA; markers were identified along the DNA strand that act as sign posts for looping the DNA strand, (by some unseen hand), the cell calls up data code as needed from any DNA location, similar to the way your hard-drive accesses files on differing segments of the memory banks.  This capability really makes DNA "3 Dimensional" the study states. (1)  The more we look into cell operation with all the technology man can muster, we see more complexity and no possibility of life's self-creation or self-order.

 The genome’s 3D structure shapes how genes are expressed — Garvan Institute 

What now, Duon's? a second control code (e.g."dual") overlapping the primary contruction code?
"Since the genetic code was deciphered in the 1960s, scientists have assumed that it was used exclusively to write information about proteins. UW scientists were stunned to discover that genomes use the genetic code to write two separate languages. One describes how proteins are made, and the other instructs the cell on how genes are controlled. One language is written on top of the other, which is why the second language remained hidden for so long."
“For over 40 years we have assumed that DNA changes affecting the genetic code solely impact how proteins are made,” said Stamatoyannopoulos. “Now we know that this basic assumption about reading the human genome missed half of the picture. These new findings highlight that DNA is an incredibly powerful information storage device, which nature has fully exploited in unexpected ways.” (1)

So what we have here is a MAC/MS like super code tha'ts been around for a billion years of accidents.  Really.  Even the utterly committed evolutionist types were "stunned".  Is any more need said about the complexity of the DNA and the cell.  Intelligence + Design acting on matter = Life. Defense rests.

Genome Uses Two Languages Simultaneously; Try That Yourself Sometime, Why Don't You - Evolution News & Views (1)

 

 Mistakes don’t equal improvements    

If you depended on 'mistakes' to update your software, (as evolutionists now claim happen in the DNA), no matter how many lifetimes you waited, would you believe Windows '7' could become Windows '8'?  No, we all agree that would be impossible; code work requires planning and logic written into a progressive and convergent working system. Software doesn’t add good code by operating over on over in experience, we know it actually tends to "crash", not improve, like mistakes accumulating over time degrading DNA, not improving it as we see in reality. 

This is true in living systems also, reproduction over many generations adds 'mistakes' to genes, not positive features.(e.g. 'genetic diseases') A well known geneticist, Ayala, postulated that due to this 'genetic load', humans may only live 300 generation's (about 10,000 years) before a complete breakdown would occur in our genes and our species fail. Remember, it’s the same code language and "hardware" (the cell) across all living things, from Algae to Man, so how can this all survive millions or even billions of years old, well, maybe because Earth and life have been in existence for a far shorter time than evolutionists tell us?  See the Time topic in this series for more (1) below.  Did you know that if man was here even at the most conservative population growth rates, more than 10x24th people would have existed in earth. Using that calculation, that's more bones than the entire universe could hold!  If evolutionists cant be trusted to allow real science to redirect their theory, how can they be trusted with age estimates?  Most uniform estimates indicate our planet is less than 10,000 years old.  The recent finding of T-Rex in soft body with intact blood cells is very supportive of a young and vibrant time-frame of Earth and Creation, not an unimportant tick of some billion year clock of the evolutionists, You are special and important to God!


Genesis Alive: The Question of Time - Earth Age & Dino Talk (1)


 

See any mistakes here? Evolution depends upon mistakes, it teaches that all life came from mutations..

Evolution teaches that mistakes in the DNA plus natural selection makes progressively complex life forms, one after another, all by some unseen mindless guiding hand, like getting Win 8 from Win 7 by accidents and time.  If evolution is true, shouldn't we observe this happening  in the natural world today?  If evolution isn't repeatable or observable, we can say evolution is 'falsified' scientifically, like the motor experiment if its not really working. 

The science establishment has insisted that all biological and natural sciences be framed in evolution as an absolute truth. As has been pointed out, this requires a faith in itself, similar to believing in God, but actually believing in nothingness, or, the random action of time on matter.  Like any belief system based on faith, one should have some basis in fact or reason to "believe.  One should always be respectful of other viewpoints and faiths for sure, but many evolutionists seem to have granted themselves the power to judge and that's not respectful.

Back to the Watch..               

  

     

So logic, fact and reason must be allowed to form ones beliefs about origin's, allowing all the evidence and possibilities to be presented.  Does the existence of a watch require a watchmaker?  In experience and reality the answer is always Yes!

Conflicting Faiths?

Many in science and education are accusing people who discuss these ideas as "back-door evangelizing" and promoting a belief in God. But is this a valid argument regarding contrasting origins ideas?  Obviously evolutionists have faith also, in time, mutations and the absence of intelligence acting on matter!  That’s a belief system based on faith, but they want a monopoly, claiming to be "scientific" and other belief systems not, meaning any thought that a super intelligence acted on matter is automatically unscientific, as long as they leave out current advances in microbiology!

So if one side says there's good reason to believe God did it by common sense and observation, that is just as valid a belief as any other, so such accusations are patently invalid and outside the realm of operational (testable, repeatable) science.  A person should be able to say, "I believe God did this" and have just as strong a logical position concerning origins science as anyone who claims it came about without intelligence or God.

How can evolutionists give themselves privilege judging those who believe differently wrong and "religious" because the person has a view, and a very strong one at that, materialists don’t share!   In a way they are making themselves almighty judges or "Gods" over origins thinking, so we actually enter the realm of mind-control, like what is taught in communist countries to manipulate and brainwash people to prolong their faith by force. 

So origins beliefs should be a personal decision unrelated to ones intelligence, ability to teach or work in science. Unfortunately the reality is that teachers or scientists that mention God as a possible answer to the origin of life are ostracized and often removed from positions by these institutions. This is what happens in communist or dictatorship run countries, and in America, the land of the free! How sad.

Truth is truth and we should be free to appropriately express as such! 

It take's a pile of faith to imagine an ion motor or a cell came about from self-made nothingness, such a view is revealing of the core philosophy of many who embrace evolution as the only answer.  Like a 747 or a Proton Motor, no one believes it formed itself, so reason conflicts with evolutionary faith. 

      

So can universal order in the natural world come about by accidents, chance and time, meaning all life came from mutations?  Or more directly, teaching that this bird and you are a mutation?  Who has any right to call you a mutant?  That’s exactly the only mechanism evolution has and promotes, it’s a degrading assertion that's absolutely wrong and a lie.

In the realm of religion, the Bible does have a hint for us;

"For since the Creation of the world, God’s invisible qualities—his eternal power and divine nature have been clearly seen, being understood from what has been made, so that man is without excuse."

Invisible qualities - Micro-sized Axial Proton powered motors, code systems and cells

Seen - see them with only the most powerful imaging sensors

Made - Intelligence acting on Matter

Without  excuse - proof that a Watchmaker exists and wants to communicate with us!

Scientists who Reject Evolution;
A world-famous chemist tells the truth: there’s no scientist alive today who understands macroevolution | Uncommon Descent

DarwinAd4.qxd - 100ScientistsAd.pdf
 

Videos;
    Unlocking the Mystery of Life (Chapter 9 of 12) - YouTube
▶ Unlocking the Mystery of Life (Chapter 10 of 12) - YouTube 
▶ How DNA Destroys Evolution by Mike Riddle - YouTube
 

Next - Evolution Falsified, use the table on the upper right to select the next section for more of the 17 topics under Sept. and Oct. Thank You!

Copyright 2014 by Mark D. Rose - All rights reserved