So
if a Princess kisses a frog and he turns into a Prince, we call it a fairytale, but if we add 500 million
years we call it "science"!
The Gulf from Single Cell to Multi-cellular life.
Once
a single celled creature, always a single celled creature, the same for
multi-celled types.
Life
begets life, but boundaries exist between kinds and complexity. So we
have the world of classical evolution telling us that this upward mindless and
somehow self-creating motivation (or Common
Decent as they like to call it) is fact. Common Decent meaning the
first cell started it all, mutated into more complex life and so on in a line
of complexity and size, crossing gaps.
Now understanding the operating principals of the cell and DNA coding, these
notions have come under intense scrutiny of late, even from those outside the
community of faith. Can we really cross this gulf without breaking the
rules of logic, experience and common sense? As Dr. Crick proposed, this
is a lot of data, thousands of different codes for all types of life like the
cell or a bird, just like different software apps and
programs. Can a 4.7 million base code single cell supposedly 'self-form' and 'self-change' into another and another and without a plan or
intelligence acting upon it? That’s what evolution theory claims, with
mindless mutation's and time it's engine and natural selection its only guiding hand!
Video-
▶ Unlocking the Mystery of Life (Chapter 10 of 12) - YouTube
Video-
▶ Unlocking the Mystery of Life (Chapter 10 of 12) - YouTube
How do we test for it?
If
we start with single cell life in the laboratory, shouldn’t we be able to
create new kinds, or even improved versions, if evolution is true?
But we see a cell mechanism that’s based on a closed code with no apparatus to
add information, no reading heads like your computer has, correct? So how does
it add new information for changes in anatomy to function all by itself? Has
evolution been observed to actually work? We will see…
Good Science in the Lab has falsified Evolution
Research
has been conducted to speedup evolutionary
potentials using time & generations in the laboratory in attempts to prove that
evolution works. So how can we speed up time? As we have
shown, life forms, even those indescribably small are very, very complex. So to make things simple, two life forms
were chosen by scientists because of their fast reproductive cycles; the
bacteria Ecoli, and the fruit fly Drosophila.
In
summary, these were subjected to every conceivable variable and environment to
call out variations through thousands of generations over time, hoping to bring about positive mutations and demonstrate working evolution.
In
the case of the bacteria, 40,000 generations were tested and no substantial
changes were observed over a 20 year period.
Ecoli
= Ecoli after 40,000 generations Mutations in
Fruit flies - does this look good?
No
matter how hard the best scientists in the world attempted to get these life
forms to evolve even a baby step, they failed.(1) In the end, a fruit
fly was a fruit fly (corrupted wings, changes in eye color) and a bacteria was
a bacteria! When the core data on the bacteria was studied, it was found
that the most changes came early in the generational timeline but effected very
little (such as resistance to various drugs, deformations, etc.), then these minor changes
flattened out for the last 3/4 of the period. This shows that pre-designed
boundaries of variation/adaptation of micro-evolution were exhibited
physiologically, then hit boundaries and could change no further. In the teams report, "Evolution of eColi". they attempt to catch a headline somehow but in truth, no evolution was exhibited whatsoever!
So
we have evolution, the Darwinian trans-kind of mutation based evolution, falsified in the laboratory. Push
as they may in controlled conditions, the fly and bacteria reacted exactly as
its programming limits in the DNA/cell mechanism allowed for its kind, no more
and no less.
So
what we know about the cell mechanism's and DNA played out perfectly with no
surprises. Evolution was falsified
- again, just as we observe living on Earth today, with no transitional
accidental types being born or living.
Tompkins,
Jeffery P. Design and complexity of the Cell 2012 p 30 (1)
Micro-Evolution Misrepresented as Macro-Evolution?
The
dog kind. Starting in size from a Chihuahua to a Great Dane, a dog is a
dog. Pure genetic information (as contained in all the original
'kinds' DNA at the beginning of life), can be manipulated through breeding to bring
out different useful traits, and adaptation
to the environment plays in but no more. In fact, breeders can selectively
cross-breed and get the code back in new offspring if they wish, but that’s not evolution, it's just great pre-planning by the Creator in using the DNA code! Mendel proved this about the time of Darwin, but few realized the importance of his evolution-confounding research. For an excellent overview, see this link;
And
how about individual personalities in the same breeds? If evolution were
true, shouldn't these be erased and each doggie have the exact same personality
and characteristics if they were a product of mindlessness? But no they
don't, the Creator has instilled
individuality and personalities in animals and as we know, People!
And what about feelings, sad/happy/angry/jealousy/etc? and what about breeding
instincts? One of our Shepard puppies would corner and herd a white
soccer ball before it never saw a sheep in his life!! Now isn't it sad that
evolution attempt's to pirate the
vast creative abilities of God and call it all mindlessly
self-made! Instinctive breeding is very useful for mankind in
domestic animals and its no accident, its in their DNA!
A
'Kind' boundary is also be related to reproduction ability, a common identifier
to determine speciation. When
different kinds exceed reproduction boundaries, such as the horse, donkey and
mule series, (1) where the offspring, mules, are sterile, a reproductive wall is
hit. So if animals mate and produce some kind of mutation, it stands to
reason a female and male must somehow find each other and be productive.
But in observation, experience and reality, this has never happened, they are
always sterile or deformed!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mule
(1)
The
evolution mechanism is always the same -Time did it!
Evolutionists
try to explain the unexplainable away with lots of time, attempting to trump
known cell mechanisms, reason, and laboratory experiments with the time
argument. So somehow the scientifically unprovable becomes fact
with enough time, imagination, drawings
and words, like the fairytale!
Fossils and time
Gaps
in the fossil record contradict evolution, a subject in this series 'The Fossil Question'.
Fossils have been proven to form in periods from days to years, all that is
needed is water, the right minerals and movement.
The
mechanism is key, a Super-Intelligence that made the environment can handle
creating a life code that ensures
'Kind' survival across a wide range of variables and climates. That’s not
evolution, that’s good design! In truth, we see a massive explosion
of all life kinds living at the same time, not isolated progression on a single
thread mutating one into another as evolution theory teaches in the "common
decent" notion, which is actually variation of kinds, with a mental leap from one class to another in
the false evolutionary progression from algae
to man.
So if dino lives long enough, he just may add feathers, hollow bones a
specialized lung, change to warm blood and fly! Oversimplification is the lifeblood of evolution. Don't think, just believe!
Actually,
Archaeopteryx has of late been identified as "all bird".
Interestingly enough, Nature recently published (July 2011) that Archy
here was a Dino, then was forced to admit fault later.
"it
had core features that define birds, such as flight feathers, wings, perching
feet, and a wishbone… (not to mention hollow bones). Archaeopteryx
is still just an extinct bird, now found with soft tissue!"1
The
Gaps of Kinds-
Evolution
claims to bridge these gaps through gross mutations in the common decent
theory;
Non-life
to life (dead chemicals to single cell marvels)
Cell
to Multi-cell
Multi-cell
to Invertebrates, (algae to worms)
Algae
to Plants, Plants to Trees/germination/seeds
Invertebrates
to Vertebrates (Snails, worms etc. to fish)
Insects?
Alone
Water
Vertebrates to Land types, (Fish to Reptiles, water to air breathing)
Reptiles
to Birds (cold blooded to warm, solid to hollow boned, 1-3 ear type)
Reptiles
to Mammals (cold blooded to warm)
Mammals
to Bats (add wings and a sonar to a mouse - 'super-mouse'!)
Mammals
back to water - Bears to Whales and Marine Mammals
At
each of these boundaries evolution would need thousands of mutational mistakes,
where are they now and why don't they exist and occur today?
The following link shows the evolutionists answer explaining how mutations invoke change;
http://www.icr.org/article/6429/
(1)
The
Gaps in the fossil record, despite clever drawings filling in the skeletal
remains, when questioned closely, have perplexed honest Zoologists for decades.
Dr.
Collin Patterson, Zoology director of the British Museum for many years was
making comments like below to inside circles in the 1980's before his passing
in 1992.
"One
day I was thinking that after studying this stuff for over 20 years, that there isn't one thing that I
knew about it, that was true. I
asked this question to various people and groups, and posted this to a very
prestigious group of evolutionists in Chicago and all I got was silence for a
long time and then someone spoke up, "well, I know one thing, it shouldn't
be taught in High School".
The
author personally interviewed Dr. Patterson about this comment and he affirmed
its accuracy and context. Though not a public advocate of
Intelligent Design, Dr. Patterson in no way opposed my understanding of origins
as presented here. He confirmed my observations of living animal gaps
with no intermediates between, I mentioning my experience and observations in
Alaska, to this his comment was; "My friends in the tropics tell me the
same thing". He closed the conversation saying -
"May you be successful in your quest for truth".
Case in point – The Reptile to Mammal series – the Ear
Humans
(and all mammals) have a 3-bone ear structure where three tiny bones link
in a line between the ear drum and nerve system. An
attractive feature designed so we can speak, eat, move and listen all at the
same time through the articulated joints. See the diagram above.
For evolution to accomplish
this feat it would involve concordant DNA code addition for the three unique and tiny
bones, the cartilage that holds them in line, auditory nerve changes, muscles,
cartilage, jaw structures, blood vessels and the like with no plan, and
according to evolution - by thousands of accidentally
convergent and working mutations over millions of years!
The reptile single bone ear
A reptile ear opening in red box
Reptile
single bone ear - hearing to prey or flee, not for speaking while eating!
A
reptile has only one of these bones (see above). So how could a single
bone ear mutate to a 3-bone ear if Common Decent is true? And where are
all the transitional forms from one to
three bone ear types (none of which have been found), and how could they
still hear while mutating from reptiles to mammals for millions of years?
How could these deaf animals survive, mate and have hearing offspring?
And
this is only one small portion of anatomy to get from a reptile to a mouse!
Ears and hearing are extremely complex organs, being very sensitive and
complex. In addition, mammals have a Corti organ, not found in reptiles;
“The Organ of Corti is a gelatinous
mass about 4 cm long and is composed of some '7500 interrelated part's'. It dispatches to the brain a coded version of the original sound
information “ (2). This is just one of the gulfs of faith evolution would
need to cross, there are thousands more. Did you come from a
lizard? Evolution says you did, 'oh, it was very slowly', they claim! And did you note; more code.
Other characteristics Evolution cannot explain:
Instincts/memory
Communication measures
Mating/pollination schemes and anatomy
Individualism (Cats differ from Dogs, Male/Female personalities)
Wood duck
Appearance and color:
Some animals are uniquely colored for survival, and of predators, helpful to conceal for success. Now think about it, how could random mindlessness arrange coloring that rivals the finest paintings Man can produce? All the effort of an artist falls short of the 3 dimensional colors of nature. Consider how many genes in the DNA are involved in the coloring of our wood duck pictured here, all requiring perfect coordination to produce the end result. So the question must be asked, how can mutations produce such concordant alignment when the DNA controls every fiber of every feather down to the molecular level? Plain reason and logic must trump mans theories, whether a higher intelligence makes better sense or not, that concept cannot be left out. We must bring reality back into our classrooms and education media and abandon the teaching of evolutionary befuddlement.
Evolutionists insist with enough time all this complexity and design is explainable, happening very slowly, so slow you can't see it, but the main thing is, never was intelligence involved. Like a slow Magician, mindless time does it, but when we look closely, time only breaks life down.
World-famous chemist tells the truth: there’s no scientist alive today who understands macroevolution;
Professor James M. Tour is currently a Professor of Chemistry, Computer Science, and Professor of Mechanical Engineering and Materials Science at Rice University. He has authored or co-authored 489 scientific publications and his name is on 36 patents.
Tour, along with over 700 other scientists, took the courageous step back in 2001 of signing the Discovery Institute’s “A Scientific Dissent from Darwinism”, which read: “We are skeptical of claims for the ability of random mutation and natural selection to account for the complexity of life. Careful examination of the evidence for Darwinian theory should be encouraged.”
" …I simply do not understand, chemically, how macroevolution could
have happened.
I
will tell you as a scientist and a synthetic chemist: if anybody should be able to understand evolution, it is me, because I
make molecules for a living".
"Let
me tell you what goes on in the back rooms of science – with National Academy
members, with Nobel Prize winners. I have sat with them, and when I get them
alone, not in public – because it’s a scary thing, if you say what I just said
– I say, “Do you understand all of this, where all of this came from, and how
this happens?” Every time that I have sat with people who are synthetic
chemists, who understand this, they go “Uh-uh. Nope.” (1)
http://www.uncommondescent.com/intelligent-design/a-world-famous-chemist-tells-the-truth-theres-no-scientist-alive-today-who-understands-macroevolution/ (1)
Our last example falsifying Evolution - Your
miracle of life
The Foramen Ovale "Life
Valve" , upper center.
Closes once in your lifetime
This
physiological event occurs at the point of delivery of every newborn
child. As a baby depends upon it's mother for life sustaining connections
while in the womb, a transfer to the air breathing, blood circulation and
other life-sustaining systems must take place in a matter of seconds after
birth.
This
interdependent and very complex sequence must take place in order. For
the blood circulation system alone, it involves a specific sequence if critical
pressures and finally the closing of a single valve in the heart, the Foramen Ovale, only used once
in your lifetime for this purpose. If any portion of the pressure
sequence fails to operate properly the heart will fail. If mindless
evolution in its accident and chance probabilities were involved in this
process, would not all the first
offspring die, so how could such a complex sequence of
events ever complete its trail and error? One would not be incorrect to
call this process "the miracle of birth", and another falsification of
evolution that says "time did it! (1)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foramen_ovale_%28heart%29 (1)
The obvious and amazing Designs in Nature point in only one direction, a Designer!
See the upper RH task bar to select another topic. Thank You!
Video - DNA - God's amazing programming; evidence for his existence
Evidence for Creation (17 ) The Reproductive System - Part 1 of 3
Copyrights 2014 by Mark D. Rose all rights reserved
See the upper RH task bar to select another topic. Thank You!
Video - DNA - God's amazing programming; evidence for his existence
Evidence for Creation (17 ) The Reproductive System - Part 1 of 3
Copyrights 2014 by Mark D. Rose all rights reserved
No comments:
Post a Comment